On a serious note though, double check that what you wanna delete really is what you select it for or even better, have a real file backup in the backhand in case something goes wrong but that shouldn't even been mentioned. When it comes to the results, i did pretty much expect nothing else, no exaggerated or bogus results i could spot, ![]() ![]() In my test i let it search in all 3 scan methods with unchanged standard selection, first two scans were pretty fast, while Full Scan took the longest, searching the whole drive, apparently. Finally, there is a option for custom folders, just a warning, it deletes THE WHOLE FOLDER being in that list, so be careful. Then there is a Exception list containing all the files you marked as exception, so they won't be scanned again but you can delete entries, you mistakenly added to the list at any point. Again, no sorting possible, which would be pretty helpful when it comes to Safe/Unsafe item selection. In the settings you can select/deselect pre-entered categories and file masks, changing it more to your liking and needs. I mention that because it's not a common thing. It also supports CTRL+Left click and SHIFT+Left click selection/deselection, giving you full control over what files you want to be deleted. Results can't be sorted in any way, which is a bummer and a minus for me or rather the program but you can view a proper details page that not only lists every single file found but it also gives some standard operations in the context menu. There are 3 different scan types, Fast, Standard and Full, all come with their very own search locations and the searching time increases depending on the method. Like most of these programs, this one comes with certain pre-given search locations or "cleaning locations" but you aren't forced into using them, you may aswell specify your own locations. Not saying much about the rating, let me add a 1 in front of the version and it makes some sense. Here TLS 1.0 is enough to prevent casual snooping on web traffic and make it far more difficult to do a scripted attack on the website than an unencrypted servers connection. But for a turnkey e-commerce service it should have disabled TLS 1.0 connections by now OR server side detect the TLS 1.0 only browsers connection and advise a newer web browser is required to complete a purchase. TLS 1.0 is fine for sites like as it does not involve the transfer of payment card input or any sensitive private information so would not be a big deal if an inteligence agency felt it necesary to try intercepting traffic. ![]() This may or may not work for IE9 and earlier after a fasshion: So by default you'd be giving continuous payments authorisation.Īlso they allow old Internet Explorer 9 to connect to the payment server which means they have enabled currently insecure TLS 1.0 encryption that is NOT considered secure enough for the transfer of private and financial information as it has known vulnerabilitis. This is very likely only a 1 year license since when you select BUY on their website the checkut page describes it as "Baisvik Disk Cleaner 3 (3PC, 1 Year Subscription" and the payment by default selects auto renewal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |